Blog

My mentor, Peat “Kane” Deibler, gave me a piece of advice that has shaped the way I’ve understood broadcasting ever since. Radio, he said, is the only form of mass media capable of creating the feeling that a broadcaster is speaking directly to one person. Television asks viewers to watch. Newspapers ask readers to consume information. Radio has always occupied a different space. A listener driving home from work, washing dishes, stocking shelves overnight, or sitting alone in a parking lot can come away believing the person behind the microphone was speaking directly to them.

That ability has never depended on transmitters, processing equipment, streaming platforms, or audience analytics. It has always depended on people. Developing that level of trust requires years of immersion in a community. Successful broadcasters learn the rhythms of the cities they serve long before they become recognizable voices within them. They discover which neighborhoods celebrate together, which local stories deserve attention, which high school football rivalry everyone talks about on Monday morning, and which tragedy leaves an entire market grieving together. Those observations accumulate slowly through lived experience. They cannot be replicated by spreadsheets, audience dashboards, or quarterly market analyses prepared hundreds of miles away.

Many of the broadcasters losing their jobs throughout 2026 built careers around that understanding. Many of the executives approving those layoffs have never occupied an air studio, prepared a local morning show, covered a breaking community story, or spent years earning the confidence of listeners one break at a time. Even so, their decisions now determine whether local radio retains the institutional knowledge that has distinguished it from nearly every other form of mass communication.

The Cuts Keep Coming

iHeartMedia began 2026 with another large-scale restructuring initiative designed to remove an additional $50 million in operating expenses after previously eliminating approximately $100 million through earlier cost reductions. In the company memo announcing those changes, Chief Programming Officer Tom Poleman and Multiplatform Group CEO Ann Marie Licata described investments in technology, operational efficiency, and stronger relationships with listeners and local communities before acknowledging that existing positions would be eliminated as part of the restructuring. The announcement reflected a familiar pattern that has accompanied corporate broadcasting for much of the past decade, where technological investment and workforce reduction increasingly appear within the same strategic plan. According to The Hollywood Reporter, the restructuring represented another phase of iHeartMedia’s long-running effort to reduce expenses following its emergence from bankruptcy in 2019.

hollywoodreporter.com/business/digital/iheartmedia-layoffs-2-1236629488

Additional reductions followed only months later. Billboard reported in June that dozens of programming and on-air positions were eliminated across the company after another round of cuts affecting management and sales earlier in the spring. The frequency of these reductions has become almost routine within the broadcasting industry. Layoffs are announced, responsibilities are redistributed among fewer employees, and public statements emphasize innovation, operational flexibility, and future growth. The language changes very little from one announcement to the next, even as the cumulative loss of local experience continues to reshape stations that once depended upon personalities with decades of community knowledge.

billboard.com/pro/iheartmedia-layoffs-radio-hosts-employees

An Industry Following the Same Blueprint

The pace of these workforce reductions becomes more concerning when viewed across the broader industry. Individual companies frequently frame layoffs as responses to unique financial circumstances or changing market conditions. Collectively, those explanations become increasingly difficult to separate from a larger operating philosophy that has steadily reshaped American radio over the past two decades.

Audacy began its own restructuring on March 6, eliminating an estimated 200 to 300 positions across New York, Philadelphia, Detroit, San Diego, and New Orleans. Company leadership characterized the reductions as an effort to streamline operations and remain competitive within a changing media environment. Those statements accompanied the departure of hundreds of employees whose work had little connection to corporate balance sheets and everything to do with the daily experience of listeners. Engineers, producers, promotions staff, programmers, salespeople, and on-air personalities disappeared from stations where many had spent years building audience familiarity and local credibility. According to RedTech, the reductions represented one of the company’s largest workforce cuts since completing its own financial restructuring.

redtech.pro/audacy-layoffs-us-radio

Additional cuts followed within weeks.

Houston listeners lost Tucker “Frito” Young and Katy Dempsey from mornings at 100.3 The Bull after only fifteen months together, despite earning recognition from both the Country Music Association and the National Association of Broadcasters through a Marconi Award. Cleveland traffic reporter Joe Czekaj departed after seven years on Classic Rock 98.5. Philadelphia audiences watched familiar voices such as Devan Kaney at WIP and Michelle Durham at KYW disappear from stations where they had become fixtures of commuters’ daily routines. According to Barrett Media, those departures formed part of another restructuring initiative that shifted programming oversight toward increasingly regional management.

barrettmedia.com/2026/04/02/audacy-begins-round-of-layoffs

Regional oversight offers measurable financial efficiencies. A smaller number of executives can supervise larger station groups, programming decisions become centralized, and payroll expenses decline. Those efficiencies carry costs that rarely appear on quarterly earnings reports. Local broadcasters accumulate years of contextual knowledge about the communities they serve. They recognize the difference between a story that matters inside a market and one that exists only because it generated attention on social media. They know which charities quietly sustain neighborhoods, which annual traditions unite cities, and which public officials have earned enough trust that listeners will believe information simply because that person delivered it. Organizations spend decades building that reservoir of credibility and can dismantle it in a matter of months.

Cumulus Media entered Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in March through a prepackaged restructuring designed to eliminate approximately $600 million in debt after another significant round of layoffs during the previous fall. According to filings submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the restructuring focused on improving the company’s long-term financial position while continuing normal business operations.

sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1058623/000110465926023855/tm267873d1_ex99-2.htm

Beasley Media Group has reduced staffing. CBS has also reduced staffing. Each announcement arrives with its own corporate language, financial rationale, and strategic explanation. Together they illustrate an industry that increasingly treats local knowledge as a variable operating expense rather than one of broadcasting’s defining assets.

For generations, radio distinguished itself from every other mass medium through proximity. Newspapers could report what happened. Television could show what happened. Radio developed relationships with communities while events were unfolding. Morning hosts attended school fundraisers. Afternoon personalities emceed charity walks. News directors answered their own station phones during severe weather. Listeners often knew broadcasters long before broadcasters knew them. Those relationships generated a form of public trust that cannot be purchased through acquisition, inherited through consolidation, or reproduced through artificial intelligence.

The financial incentives shaping modern broadcasting reward a different set of priorities. Shareholders evaluate margins, operating costs, debt obligations, and revenue growth. Those measurements influence investment decisions because they are quantifiable. Audience trust, institutional memory, and community relationships resist simple measurement despite representing many of the qualities that historically distinguished successful local stations from their competitors. As those intangible assets disappear, radio gradually becomes easier to manage from a corporate office while becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish from every other source of audio competing for listeners’ attention.

Recognition, Leadership, and the Direction of the Industry

The discussion becomes even more complicated when viewed alongside the honors the industry chooses to bestow upon its leadership.

Bob Pittman, Chairman and CEO of iHeartMedia, was selected for induction into the 2026 Radio Hall of Fame by the Hall’s nominating committee. The ceremony is scheduled for October 8 in Chicago and recognizes a career that spans some of the most influential media companies of the modern era. According to Radio Ink, Pittman’s career includes co-founding MTV, holding senior leadership positions at AOL Time Warner, and leading the transformation of Clear Channel into iHeartMedia, the nation’s largest radio broadcaster.

radioink.com/2026/05/20/bob-pittman-rickey-smiley-among-2026-radio-hall-of-fame-class

Those accomplishments deserve acknowledgment because they permanently altered the business side of American media. Building the country’s largest radio group required strategic vision, financial discipline, and an understanding of how broadcasting would evolve through consolidation and digital distribution. No honest assessment of Pittman’s career can ignore that influence.

Recognition, however, also reflects the priorities of the institutions granting it.

The timing surrounding this year’s induction naturally invites broader questions about the values shaping modern broadcasting. Hundreds of local positions have disappeared across the country’s largest radio companies while executive leadership continues to receive the industry’s highest honors. That contrast extends beyond any single executive or any single company. It reflects a widening separation between those responsible for corporate governance and those responsible for maintaining the relationship listeners have with their local stations.

Local broadcasters rarely become nationally recognizable figures. Their influence exists almost entirely within the communities they serve. Listeners remember the morning host who stayed on the air through tornado warnings, the afternoon personality who spent weekends raising money for children’s hospitals, or the news anchor who became a trusted voice during moments of uncertainty. Those contributions seldom appear in annual reports because they generate value that cannot be measured through quarterly earnings. Their absence, however, becomes immediately noticeable once they are gone.

An industry’s Hall of Fame inevitably tells future generations what that industry chose to celebrate. Executive leadership occupies an important place in that history. Local broadcasters occupy an equally important one. Healthy industries preserve room to recognize both.

Public Policy Is Beginning to Reflect the Same Concerns

Questions surrounding consolidation are no longer confined to trade publications, former broadcasters, or conversations inside station hallways.

The musicFIRST Coalition and the Future of Music Coalition recently submitted comments to the Federal Communications Commission documenting staffing reductions across iHeartMedia, Audacy, Beasley Media Group, Cumulus Media, and CBS since 2024. Their filing argues that continued workforce reductions and the elimination of local programming complicate longstanding claims that additional ownership consolidation produces stronger local service. According to Radio Ink, the organizations urged the FCC to weigh those developments as it considers future ownership policy.

radioink.com/2026/07/06/are-layoffs-undercutting-radios-consolidation-argument

The debate surrounding consolidation has existed for decades. Larger ownership groups have consistently argued that economies of scale provide financial stability, operational efficiency, and the resources necessary to compete with rapidly expanding digital platforms. Those arguments carry legitimate economic considerations, particularly as advertising revenue has become increasingly fragmented across streaming services, podcasts, social media, and online video.

The discussion becomes considerably more complicated when consolidation coincides with sustained reductions in local staffing.

FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez described many local media outlets as having been “hollowed out,” language that reflects concern over the long-term capacity of local broadcasters to fulfill their public service obligations. The phrase captures a distinction that financial statements rarely illustrate. Broadcast licenses authorize the use of public spectrum with the expectation that stations will serve the communities to which those licenses are assigned. Local programming, emergency information, civic engagement, and public accountability have historically formed part of that understanding. A station can continue transmitting twenty-four hours a day while gradually losing many of the people responsible for carrying out those responsibilities.

Technology has expanded radio’s reach in remarkable ways. A listener can stream a hometown station from thousands of miles away with almost no delay. Voice tracking has improved dramatically. Automation is more sophisticated than at any point in broadcasting history. None of those developments diminish the value of human judgment rooted in local experience. Communities still experience emergencies, celebrate victories, mourn tragedies, and tell stories that require someone who understands why they matter to the people living there.

To Everyone Still Doing the Work

Every broadcaster understands that radio has always been a difficult business. Formats change. Ratings fluctuate. Ownership groups merge. Advertising contracts during economic downturns. Job security has never been one of the profession’s defining characteristics.

The current environment feels different because the uncertainty extends well beyond individual stations or isolated ownership groups. Broadcasters across the country have watched experienced colleagues disappear through repeated restructuring initiatives that have become increasingly common throughout the industry. Years of accumulated knowledge leave with them. Familiar voices disappear. Entire departments shrink. Remaining employees continue producing local radio while carrying workloads that would have belonged to several people only a few years earlier.

Many of the people affected by these reductions dedicated decades to developing skills that cannot be acquired through software training or management seminars. They learned how to recognize the emotional temperature of a community after a tragedy. They understood when humor belonged on the air and when silence carried greater meaning. They developed instincts that allowed listeners to feel understood without ever meeting the person behind the microphone. Those qualities represent professional expertise built through repetition, observation, and genuine connection with the communities they served.

Radio’s enduring strength has never originated from corporate ownership structures or transmission facilities. Every period of sustained success in the medium’s history has been driven by broadcasters who understood the people on the other side of the speaker. Technology continues to evolve. Business models continue to evolve. Audience habits continue to evolve. The need for authentic human connection has remained remarkably consistent through every stage of broadcasting’s history.

The future of radio will ultimately depend upon whether the industry continues treating that connection as one of its most valuable assets or as another operating expense that can be reduced whenever the next quarterly report demands it.

I don’t think we’re meant to stay in one place forever. I’ve never believed that where you’re born is where you have to stay. But there’s a difference between moving on and forgetting where you started — and having pride in where you’re from is worth holding onto. The way people talk to each other, the food you can’t get anywhere else, the pace of life that shapes how a place fits together — there’s nothing quite like that sense of belonging to where you came from.

I’ve now lived on my own in four different states, and there’s nothing that comes close to the transparency I grew up with in New Jersey. Back home, I never had to wonder where I stood with anyone. I didn’t have to guess how people felt about a situation, or about me. I knew where I stood, and that let me see things for what they actually were. It taught me why keeping things quiet — holding it all in instead of saying it — is so toxic, and how much it can wear down a relationship over time.

I left New Jersey for Colorado, where people are far more likely to shrug something off than engage with it directly. There’s a laid-back, “we’re too cool to care” energy out there that took some getting used to. Washington State was the opposite in a different way — everything filtered through a layer of politeness that made it hard to tell what anyone actually meant. I learned to read between the lines just to figure out where I stood, which was a real adjustment after growing up somewhere so direct.

Then there’s the South, where hospitality is baked into every interaction — but it took me a while as an outsider to learn that warmth and full transparency aren’t always the same thing. Southern charm is famous for a reason: people are welcoming, quick with a smile, generous with their time. But there’s also a “we’ll deal with it when it comes” approach to hard conversations that I never quite adjusted to. I grew up believing you plan for the worst so you’re ready for it, so that mentality took some real recalibrating on my part.

None of this is a knock on any of these places — I’m generalizing based on my own experience, and generalizations always leave things out. Every place I’ve lived has taught me something different about how people connect, disagree, and show up for each other. But after living in all four, I keep landing on the same conclusion: I’ll take directness over comfort, every time. Knowing exactly where I stand with someone — even when it’s blunt, even when it stings a little — beats spending my energy trying to read between the lines.

The East Coast isn’t perfect. No place is. But the honesty, the “let’s get to business” mentality, the sense that people will tell you the truth even when it’s inconvenient — that’s what I miss wherever I go, and that’s what I’m proud of.

Ah, the joys of the East Coast. There’s the tri-state area (where I grew up), Tom Brady fan boys, New York pizza, boardwalk rides, dirty beaches — and in most non-natives’ opinion, rude people. Something about that gets to me. We’re not rude, I promise. Living out in Colorado, I’ve met more rude Uber drivers, store clerks, and daily randoms on the street in a month than I’ve probably dealt with in all my years on the East Coast. I’ve also never been denied service with my guide dog by an Uber driver on the East Coast — in New Jersey, New York, or Florida. So what does that say? Here are seven reasons East Coasters are the way they are.

1. We mind our own business. We’re all about rush, rush, rush. We don’t want to inconvenience you, and we don’t want you to inconvenience us. Nine times out of ten, we don’t care what you’re doing — and we don’t have to. What’s rude about that? I’ll let you live your life, and you let me live mine.
2. There are just too many people. The blind guy walking down the street in New York City, the businessman in a suit, the woman walking home with her groceries, the fifty people in line at Starbucks, the vendor selling hot dogs on the corner — do we really need to acknowledge everyone we pass? Most places don’t grasp the sheer size of the tri-state area. Not being greeted by a stranger isn’t going to hurt you — we’re actually saving you time.
3. We don’t do long stories in tight spaces. I’ll have a conversation with you, I’ll get to know you — for the two minutes you’re checking me out, or the few minutes we’re on the bus together. You don’t need to tell me your whole life story, not because I don’t want to hear it, but because there are other people around who didn’t sign up for it. I was on a bus once in New York and a guy spent twenty straight minutes venting about politics. I finally told him, “Sir, you and a few million other Americans feel the same way. Complaining to me isn’t going to change anything. Good luck.” He wasn’t the only one who didn’t need to hear it.
4. We’re actually considerate. I’ve gotten more unprompted help navigating New York City — people asking if I needed assistance — than in Colorado, LA, Washington D.C., and my hometown of Paterson, New Jersey, combined. Where’s the rudeness in that? Those small moments of people stopping to help have led me to meet some genuinely inspiring people.
5. We’re loud. We’re animated. We’re expressive about everything — the drama in our families, the chaos at work. We like people to know we’re having a good time, and we like them to know we’re not messing around. Protest leaders yell to get a point across. Same idea.
6. Road rage is real — and it’s not personal. It’s just our way of saying “get out of the way.” And if you cut someone off, just go. Don’t hesitate. That’s the move.
7. Weed still isn’t legal here. Might make us seem uptight, but the East Coast is a little behind the curve compared to Denver, Seattle, and Portland.

Most people assume I’m just an ignorant, rude East Coast kid with no friends and too much time to write articles defending home turf. I’ve got great friends, and I’ve wanted to be a radio personality since I was six years old. I love talking to people — I want to be the friend people can fall back on, the voice that’s a distraction from the everyday grind. I’m the guy who might actually want to hear your story, because every conversation makes me more knowledgeable for when I’m on air. Everything we do is built from experience — sometimes the average East Coaster just doesn’t want you to be part of theirs, and that’s okay.

There’s been so much talk around social media companies taking over and directing digital exposure after Donald Trump was suspended from major platforms following his involvement in what happened at the Capitol on January 6th. Whether you support or oppose that decision, I want to talk about how special Twitter was when the network was brand new — there’s something to be said about how some of the richest people and corporations can just kick us off if they don’t like what we say, though I’d argue we already know not to yell “bomb” in an airport or “fire” in a crowded theater.

I knew a guy from Chicago who was great with computers. We spent a lot of time on Skype, and he followed all the latest tech and hacker news — always ahead of the curve. In April or May of 2008, he told me about a microblogging service that was starting to catch on: Twitter. I signed up for my account that May but didn’t really start using it until desktop apps became accessible in early 2009. When I did start using it more, the site was basic and minimal — I don’t even remember trending topics being on the main page. Tweets maxed out at 140 characters, including everything, and there weren’t many options to shorten links, so that ate into your space too. I always wondered why 140 was the number — turns out it was influenced by the character limit on early cell phones. Android still works that way in some respects today.

Something changed on June 25th, 2009. Michael Jackson was in the hospital, and passed away from what would later be ruled a homicide involving an acute propofol and benzodiazepine overdose. I remember the news breaking on Twitter before any news station picked it up — that was the real breakthrough moment for me. People realized they could get news faster on this network than anywhere else. Farrah Fawcett passed the same day, and three days later Billy Mays, the OxiClean pitchman, passed in his sleep. Twitter was on top of every one of those stories before traditional media caught up.

By high school, Twitter had become the thing — especially senior year. Get-togethers were scheduled over it, funny takes got chatted about, pictures and videos got exchanged. There was even a standalone “Twitter Video” app for a while. Celebrities were all over the platform, and in 2009 the first celebrity to follow me was New York/New Jersey’s own Kat DeLuna. Back then, celebrities actually tweeted people back. That newness was something to appreciate — everyone was figuring it out together, and it was easy to make friends in a way that doesn’t feel as common on social media now. I still follow people I met on Twitter through conversations about shows like NBC’s The Voice.

I understand platforms have to evolve, and with more information circulating, more characters were probably needed. But I’ll always have a soft spot for Vine — the six-second video clip app that’s been gone since January 2017. There was something special about being forced to be funny, or to promote something effectively, or to edit a story down to its essential pieces, all in six seconds. I feel the same way about old Twitter, before the character limit doubled: watching how creative people got within a tight constraint made everyone a little better at getting their point across.

If you’ve been on the platform a while, I’d love to hear your story. How long have you been on Twitter? Do you run multiple accounts? What are some of your best moments on there? I’ve had some incredible exchanges — brands responding, celebrities liking and retweeting — and it’s thanks to Twitter that I landed radio interviews with people like Australian EDM producer tyDi and pop artist Neon Hitch. If you’ve got stories like that, I want to hear them.